Big thanks to Alex Fitch of Resonance FM for putting this up so quickly!
Enjoy!
Monday, 27 February 2012
Interviewed on Resonance FM for Egypt in Comic Books.
For those of you who missed me waxing comics-lyrical last night on Resonance FM, here's a link to the podcast, which covers aspects of the use of Egypt in modern comic books.
Thursday, 23 February 2012
Egypt and Comics: Mythology and Pop Art Reflections
"Asterix, Tintin, Thundercats, Dr Fate, Promethea and Hawkman - comics have engaged with Egypt in a range of different ways. In this talk Dr Paul Harrison analyses the manner in which Western conceptions of Egypt, heritage and legacy are portrayed in mainstream comics. Q & A included"
As advertised on the BBC,
The last one was standing room only, so please ensure you get there early. I have high hopes for this one,
Dr P
Success!
It is with great pleasure that I announce the successful attainment of my PhD. There are many of you who contributed to my research over the last four years, some of whom were instrumental (you know who you are) and to you guys I offer a huge thank you.
I know it cannot have been easy to trust an unknown entity, particularly an academic, entrenched within a hegemonic 'positivist' discipline, but I'm very grateful that you did, and I would like to assure everybody that the subjects of reconstructed and revived Egyptian religion, Egyptian Paganism, and Kemeticism received serious and balanced discussion in my work (which will be available in publication soon enough).
I also offer thanks to those academics and friends who have helped me out along the way. You know who you are.
Yours,
Dr Paul Harrison, BSc MA PhD
Monday, 30 May 2011
'Space archaeology'
For those that may have missed it (which seems impossible by now), Dr Sarah Parcak of the University of Alabama has made a number of 'archaeological discoveries' utilising satellite imagery, including 'More than 1,000 tombs and 3,000 ancient settlements.' This is, of course, hugely significant to our field, and i hope it will bring in more interest, research, funding (makes the archaeological world go round), and ultimately more people into the folds of Egypto...what? 'ology'? 'Mania'? Perhaps too pejorative.
Either way, this is sure to attract attention for a while, and hopefully open up new opportunities both within Egypt for the local populace, and without for the various interest groups involved. It is important to remember, however, that such tools are only that: tools. They can be used constructively or...well, not so positively, and I hope these resources are well-managed. We also need to remember that discovery is not excavation, nor is it interpretation, one of the most fundamental, and fundamentally overlooked, aspects of our field. My hope is that we are not so swept up in scientific advancement that we forget the dangers of the positivistic mindset, so evident in early Egyptology.
However, this represents a form of 'progression', in some sense, for Egyptology and archaeology everywhere, and I for one am curious about the possibilities on the horizon...
Either way, this is sure to attract attention for a while, and hopefully open up new opportunities both within Egypt for the local populace, and without for the various interest groups involved. It is important to remember, however, that such tools are only that: tools. They can be used constructively or...well, not so positively, and I hope these resources are well-managed. We also need to remember that discovery is not excavation, nor is it interpretation, one of the most fundamental, and fundamentally overlooked, aspects of our field. My hope is that we are not so swept up in scientific advancement that we forget the dangers of the positivistic mindset, so evident in early Egyptology.
However, this represents a form of 'progression', in some sense, for Egyptology and archaeology everywhere, and I for one am curious about the possibilities on the horizon...
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
Bec 3 at the British Museum
I recently attended the Third British Egyptology Congress at the British Museum, where I presented my first conference paper on this research. I had surprisingly good attendance at my little room, as I was expecting maybe 10 people (collegues/friends) and ended up with a reasonably full room. I take that as an encouraging sign that there are many other Egyptologists out there interested in expanding the horizons of our discipline.
Though I definitely had too much material for the time allowed I think I managed to give a fairly succint overview (three years work in 20 mins is no mean feat!). I would have loved to have had more time to explore some of the groundbreaking work I've encountered in my research (in particular Richard Reidy's Eternal Egypt and Kerry Wisner's 'hwt-hrw' online) but sadly an overview it remained.
I was quizzed at the end by none other than Mark Lehner himself (I hadn't realised he was sitting at the back) who cut straight to the point and asked the very fundamental question of 'give me an actual example of where this research has contributed to Egyptology' (not those exact words, but that was the principle behind it).
So I highlighted the example of taboo, and that when practising ancient ritual certain things become more fundamental to understand. In this case I mentioned the blood taboo asserted by the Kemetic Orthodox Faith, that is the taboo surrounding menstruation and ritual. For HoN this was ported over from African Traditional Religions, and 'filled a gap' in our Egyptological understanding of the subject. Very little research on this topic exists in academic Egyptology. There are a couple of notable examples by Fransden and some interesting notes by Quirke, but by and large it is a topic we do not claim to have a complete comprehension of. However, some fascinating reasearch has been done on this topic by Kemetic reconstructionists, as it is an immediate concern for women looking to participate in regular ritual and not be inhibited by a menstrual cycle. I won't go into details about the research I've encountered here, but it is fair to say I found it very useful, and it introduced me to some sources I would otherwise not have looked at. That alone, for me 'justifies' (not that building bridges should ever need justification) this kind of research.
Now I realise what I'm saying here is that this research highlights our blindnesses, as academics, and encourages us to look at topics from a different perspective. As Jan Assman implies and Jeremy Naydler asserts, we cannot engage in a phenomenological study of Egyptian ritual and remain 'Egyptologists' simply because of the positivist foundational methods of our field. But perhaps we can sidestep such boundaries, albeit briefly, in order to be informed of other perspectives.
So my point is that discussion on such issues, with 'comitted outsiders' (many of whom are actually 'insiders' studying Egypt academically!) encourages debate and makes us look at primary evidence more closely. I did what I could to convince my peers that there is valid research occuring on 'the other side' and I hope that eventually such research will speak for itself. Mine is not an exhaustive study, nor can it be representative of any group in question beyond my own subjective perspectives. It is but a tentative step, the first plank of a bridge I'd very much like to see built.
Though I definitely had too much material for the time allowed I think I managed to give a fairly succint overview (three years work in 20 mins is no mean feat!). I would have loved to have had more time to explore some of the groundbreaking work I've encountered in my research (in particular Richard Reidy's Eternal Egypt and Kerry Wisner's 'hwt-hrw' online) but sadly an overview it remained.
I was quizzed at the end by none other than Mark Lehner himself (I hadn't realised he was sitting at the back) who cut straight to the point and asked the very fundamental question of 'give me an actual example of where this research has contributed to Egyptology' (not those exact words, but that was the principle behind it).
So I highlighted the example of taboo, and that when practising ancient ritual certain things become more fundamental to understand. In this case I mentioned the blood taboo asserted by the Kemetic Orthodox Faith, that is the taboo surrounding menstruation and ritual. For HoN this was ported over from African Traditional Religions, and 'filled a gap' in our Egyptological understanding of the subject. Very little research on this topic exists in academic Egyptology. There are a couple of notable examples by Fransden and some interesting notes by Quirke, but by and large it is a topic we do not claim to have a complete comprehension of. However, some fascinating reasearch has been done on this topic by Kemetic reconstructionists, as it is an immediate concern for women looking to participate in regular ritual and not be inhibited by a menstrual cycle. I won't go into details about the research I've encountered here, but it is fair to say I found it very useful, and it introduced me to some sources I would otherwise not have looked at. That alone, for me 'justifies' (not that building bridges should ever need justification) this kind of research.
Now I realise what I'm saying here is that this research highlights our blindnesses, as academics, and encourages us to look at topics from a different perspective. As Jan Assman implies and Jeremy Naydler asserts, we cannot engage in a phenomenological study of Egyptian ritual and remain 'Egyptologists' simply because of the positivist foundational methods of our field. But perhaps we can sidestep such boundaries, albeit briefly, in order to be informed of other perspectives.
So my point is that discussion on such issues, with 'comitted outsiders' (many of whom are actually 'insiders' studying Egypt academically!) encourages debate and makes us look at primary evidence more closely. I did what I could to convince my peers that there is valid research occuring on 'the other side' and I hope that eventually such research will speak for itself. Mine is not an exhaustive study, nor can it be representative of any group in question beyond my own subjective perspectives. It is but a tentative step, the first plank of a bridge I'd very much like to see built.
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
Richard Reidy
I recently had the pleasure of meeting Richard Reidy, author of Eternal Egypt: Ancient Rituals for the Modern World, in San Francisco. We talked about his work, and the progress of Egyptian Reconstruction in general, and it was an evening of fascinating discussion.
I strongly urge anybody who's interested in Egyptian ritual, whether for ritual or academic purposes, to check out his book. A sample can be found on Google books and the book itself is available as a paperback or ebook below and in all good stores.
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?Book=172324
I strongly urge anybody who's interested in Egyptian ritual, whether for ritual or academic purposes, to check out his book. A sample can be found on Google books and the book itself is available as a paperback or ebook below and in all good stores.
http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?Book=172324
British Museum Talks
I'll be speaking on my research at the British Museum on the 12th of September, as part of The Third British Egyptology Congress (BEC3). Tickets are limited, and not cheap, but if you end up coming along please feel free to find me at the con if you have any questions on my research.
Harrison
Harrison
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)